Considerations To Know About documents of property must present before court case law
Considerations To Know About documents of property must present before court case law
Blog Article
seventy seven . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of your Constitution based to the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
۔۔۔۔واقعاتی شہادت فوجداری قانون مین درجہ بندی کے لھاظ سے کمزور حیثیت رکھتی ہے۔۔۔ جب تک واقعاتی شہادت کی تمام کڑیاں اس طریقے سے فراہم نہ کی گءی ہوں کہ ایک متواتر زنجیر کی شکل اختیار کرے اور مقتول اور قاتل کے درمیان نہ ٹوٹنے والا سلسلہ قاءم کرے تب تک سزاےموت یا تعزیری سزا /عمر قید کسی کو دینا انصاف کے اصولوں کے منافی ہے۔
In this landmark case, the Supreme Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment around the grounds of extenuating circumstances. The court acknowledged that while the crime of murder was proven, the offender experienced a history of mental illness, which played a significant role in committing the offense. This case established a precedent for contemplating mitigating factors during sentencing.
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed within the bank and given that only the appellants were posted with the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is perfectly-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety times. When the appeal just isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she can then solution the service tribunal to challenge the first order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, since the ninety times for the department to act has already expired. To the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided through the decision of your Supreme Court in the case of Dr.
The recent amendment to Section 489-File of the Pakistan Penal Code signifies a progressive step towards effectively combatting counterfeiting activities. Through its expanded scope, heightened penalties, and technological considerations, the amendment aligns the legislation with contemporary challenges.
S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation involves the names on the parties to the first case, the court in which the case was read, the date it had been decided, along with the book in which it truly is recorded. Different citation requirements may well involve italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.
Extra username and password are demanded for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it demands legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be produced and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected read more from liability from the matter, but couldn't be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this kind of ruling, the defendants took their request into the appellate court.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent could not be proved unless case is tried out(Bail Matters)
However, it’s essential to note that the application of your death penalty is subject matter to several legal safeguards and owing process to guarantee fair trials.
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary towards the determination from the current case are called obiter dicta, which constitute persuasive authority but aren't technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil regulation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]